Diabetes Follow Up – Three months or six months?

Three Months

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Mar 17. doi: 10.1111/dom.12288. [Epub ahead of print]:
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 3-monthly versus 6-monthly monitoring of well-controlled type 2 diabetes patients: a pragmatic randomised controlled patient-preference equivalence trial in primary care (EFFIMODI study).
Wermeling PR1, Gorter KJ, Stellato RK, de Wit GA, Beulens JW, Rutten GE.

In this study of 2000 patients in the Netherlands, key clinical indicators were largely the same when well controlled patients with established and stable Type II diabetes were seen at six monthly intervals rather than three monthly.

“Patients with good cardiometabolic control and without preference for their monitoring frequency can visit the primary care physician less often. The cost-savings can be considerable.”

Read More

Mediterranean Diet wins again!

Med diet

Diabetes Care. 2014 Apr 10. [Epub ahead of print]

The Effects of a Mediterranean Diet on Need for Diabetes Drugs and Remission of Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: Follow-up of a Randomized Trial – Esposito K1, Maiorino MI, Petrizzo M, Bellastella G, Giugliano D.

There can now be little doubt that we all need to move to Tuscany.

In this 8 year follow up of a previous study, the low carb Mediterranean Diet was very significantly more successful than a low-fat diet in delaying the need for diabetic medication and for causing remission of diabetes.

Participants following the low carb Mediterranean diet were instructed to include plenty of vegetables, choose whole grain versions of starchy foods, replace most red meat with poultry and fish, and have at least 30% of their calories from fat, particularly from olive oil.

Read More

Handbook of Non Drug Interventions

CarouselThe RACGP is collating a series of articles that will together comprise a Handbook of non-drug interventions (“HANDI” ).

From the HANDI site:

“Advances in non-drug treatments in the past few decades have been substantial and diverse: exercise for heart failure and COPD, the Epley manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, knee taping for osteoarthritis, cognitive therapy for depression (and almost everything else!), ‘bibliotherapy’ (specific guided self-help books for some conditions), to name just a few.

Nearly half the thousands of clinical trials conducted each year are for non-drug treatments. However, the effective non-drug methods are less well known, less well promoted, and less well used than their pharmaceutical cousins.

There are well-established drugs/medications formularies such as the Australian Medicines Handbook. However, until now, no such formulary or resource for non-drug treatments (interventions) exists.

The HANDI project is a commitment by the RACGP National Standing Committee for Quality Care to promote effective non-drug treatments, making them visible and easy to use. HANDI is an online formulary of non-drug interventions in health care, which have solid evidence of their effectiveness.

Based on the idea of modern pharmacopoeias, each HANDI entry includes indications, contraindications and ‘dosing’. The aim is to make ‘prescribing’ a non-drug therapy almost as easy as writing a prescription for a drug.

HANDI enables clinicians to offer a greater choice of interventions to a patient, who may wish to avoid pharmacotherapy and the risks and life style changes often associated with drug treatment regimes.”

The HANDI team is led by Paul Glaziou, Professor of Evidence-Based Medicine at Bond University.

Read More

Continuity of Care reduces the Risk of Preventable Hospital Admissions

Continuity of Care and the Risk of Preventable Hospitalization in Older Adults

Nyweide DJ, Anthony DL, Bynum JP, et al. Continuity of care and the risk of preventable hospitalization in older adults. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(20):1879-1885.

More evidence of the benefits of a long term relationship with a particular provider for elderly patients.

Importance

Preventable hospitalizations are common among older adults for reasons that are not well understood.

Objective

To determine whether Medicare patients with ambulatory visit patterns indicating higher continuity of care have a lower risk of preventable hospitalization.

Results

Of the 3 276 635 eligible patients, 12.6% had a preventable hospitalization during their 2-year observation period, most commonly for congestive heart failure (25%), bacterial pneumonia (22.7%), urinary infection (14.9%), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (12.5%). After adjustment for patient baseline characteristics and market-level factors, a 0.1 increase in continuity of care according to either continuity metric was associated with about a 2% lower rate of preventable hospitalization (continuity of care score hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.98-0.99; usual provider continuity score HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.98-0.98). Continuity of care was not related to mortality rates.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries older than 65 years, higher continuity of ambulatory care is associated with a lower rate of preventable hospitalization.

Read More

Should we use Aspirin with Warfarin?

Use and Associated Risks of Concomitant Aspirin Therapy With Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Circulation 2013;128(7):721-728.

Should we use Apsirin with Warfarin?

Probably not, as there is a significantly increased risk of bleeding (aHR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.2 – 2.0), and little to no difference in cardiovascular events, even in those with a Hx of AMI or CVA who were therefore receiving aspirin as ‘secondary’ prevention.

Read More